Weighing The Week Ahead: A Message From The Bond Market?

Last week's wild trading defied any simple explanation. That always sets the table for pundit pontification!

We are still a week away from earnings season. Bond, stock and commodity prices are moving in different directions. I expect this divergence to be a focus of attention, with many asking: Is the Bond Market Sending a Message about the ?

Prior Theme Recap

In last week's WTWA I predicted that there would be a focus on alleged January effects. That was very accurate, especially after the first two days of the week included a major decline. As always, Doug Short's weekly snapshot tells the story at a glance. If you snoozed through the week, you missed it!

 

 

 

Here were the competing theories:

  • As goes January, so goes the year. Most of these stories included January as part of year, so the result was biased.
  • As goes the first X days of January, so goes January. Once again the analysts often included these days in the month's result, biasing the outcome. They also argued over whether January 2nd should count, since it was part of the holiday week. One top authority said that the theory worked for the first two days, but not the first five. Another expert, a regular on CNBC's Fast Money, chained the days and the month together, calling the evidence irrefutable.
  • I hope that my readers will be skeptical about two days of trading predicting the next 250. There is certainly no reason to pick two days rather than five. These are the stories attracting big ratings, despite making little sense.

    What you should do, of course, is look at the independent and dependent variable separately, using January to predict the next eleven months. You might also ask whether the same effect is seen in any other months. CXO Advisory reported this research last year. January explains only about 5% of the variance for the rest of the year, with the rest left to randomness or other factors. January is no better than other months. Etc. This kind of research deserves more publicity. This chart (one of many good ones in the article) shows that whatever the very modest effect, it ended over 30 years ago.

     

     

    Will we hear the same story next year? Probably. These stories never seem to die.

    Feel free to join in my exercise in thinking about the upcoming theme. We would all like to know the direction of the market in advance. Good luck with that! Second best is what to look for and how to react. That is the purpose of considering possible themes for the week ahead.

    This Week's Theme

    While there is plenty of news on tap this week, we still have a week before the start of earnings season. It is a time that defies easy explanation, with wild gyrations in stocks and divergent moves in bonds and commodities.

    I expect a focus on bonds, with the question:

    Is the Bond Market Sending a Message about the Economy?

    There are two basic viewpoints:

  • Bonds are flashing a recession warning. Peter Eavis of the NYT's DealB%k has a post on the perspective of the bond guys.
  • Low bond yields reflect other unusual factors. Menzie Chinn at Econbrowser describes some of these.
  • Bonds not cheap, but no bubble. (Prof. Shiller via Money).
  • As always, I have some ideas about last week's trading as well as next week's question. More on that in today's conclusion. But first, let us do our regular update of the last week's news and data. Readers, especially those new to this series, will benefit from reading thebackground information.

    Last Week's Data

    Each week I break down events into good and bad. Often there is “ugly” and on rare occasion something really good. My working definition of “good” has two components:

  • The news is market-friendly. Our personal policy preferences are not relevant for this test. And especially – no politics.
  • It is better than expectations.
  • The Good

    There was a normal news week, with a positive tilt.

  • Auto sales remained strong at a 16.8 million annual rate. But growth might be slowing. (Reuters).
  • Consumer confidence via the Conference Board hits a new high. The Gallup weekly poll also shows strength.
  • Dividends rose 10% in Q4. (Eddy Elfenbein).
  • Initial jobless claims hold below 300K. This was a slight miss on stated expectations, but the small deviation is not the key story.Calculated Risk puts it in perspective, including this chart:
  •  

     

  • Employment net gains beat expectations. As usual this complex report had a mixed story.

    • Net job gains continue to grow at a strong pace. It was the strongest year of job growth in the last 15, but economists still give the news a “B.” WSJ covers and see the “Bad” news below.
    • ADP private employment confirms the story
    • It hits the Fed's sweet spot for improvement. (Jon Hilsenrath).
    • Unemployment falls
  • Print Friendly, PDF & Email
    No tags for this post.

    Related posts

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *